How Much Revenue Should You Have Before Hiring Help?

I’ve been getting lots of questions lately about hiring. Mostly, solo practitioners are asking me whether they’re ready to add the overhead of a staff person or second attorney.

It’s a tough question to answer because the answer depends on a variety of factors. We all know that the same numbers mean something different in different parts of the United States (I’m focusing on the United States because I understand U.S. money. If you’re in another part of the world—and I know lots of you are—you’re going to have to extrapolate). Dollars in a big city don’t go as far as they go in some small towns and vice-versa. However, we are more alike than we are different (the McDonald’s dollar menu is nationwide), and we can tweak these numbers as necessary.

My answer to this question is based on revenue. It’s important, however, not to become overly distracted by the revenue number. Revenue is the second most important number. Profit is the most important number. Generating lots of revenue without generating a profit isn’t sustainable. While I’m focusing on revenue to answer this question, you should be very careful to keep your eye on your personal profit.

I think you should run your operation by yourself with no other personnel until you generate about $25,000 per month in revenue. When you hit that number, then it’s fine to add assistance. Don’t add people until you’re consistently in that zone. You should be able to pay for some assistance prior to hitting $25,000 in revenue, but do it using outsourced and virtual services like an answering service, bookkeeping service, IT help desk, etc. Don’t commit to a salary for your help.

When you hit $25,000 monthly, you’re collecting a bit over $1,000 for each workday. At $200 per hour, that’s about five billed hours a day (although I’m not big on billing hourly). That’s a reasonable amount of billing, and you can manage that along with the other tasks of running your office. As you get close to $25,000, you might want to add a bit of part-time help—maybe a courier service, a virtual assistant, or a virtual paralegal if you’re able to take home a big chunk of that $25,000 each month. If you’re generating close to $25,000 and you’re not taking half of it home, then it’s time to go back to the drawing board and see where the money is going.

There are lots of reasons that my number can miss the mark in your practice. Of course, I have the most experience in family law. If you’re practicing in another area, my number might not be relevant. If you’re spending big dollars on marketing (25%+), my number might not work. You might also have objectives regarding family time (but I think you can achieve that by taking fewer clients more easily than by hiring someone). I’m answering this question because I’m being asked for an answer, and it’s tough to answer without being very specific.

Some of you won’t like my number. You’ll complain that your working like crazy and can’t get things done without help even though your revenue is substantially below $25,000. I’d suggest that the problem isn’t a lack of assistance. It’s more likely a failure to charge and collect appropriate fees, an organizational issue or some other problem. If you correct the underlying issue you won’t be on overload and you won’t need the help.

If, however, you’re like most of the family law practitioners that I talk to, then my number probably makes good sense. You should be very hesitant to add people to your payroll until you’ve exceeded $25,000 per month in revenue.

Related articles:

  1. What to Do about the Holiday Revenue Slump
  2. How To Make Hiring You Frictionless
  3. Revenue is Down
  4. How Much Should You Spend on Marketing?
  5. How to Convert a PDF to Text without Software

  • Julie K

    These sorts of benchmarks are helpful and offer a means to evaluate and compare your income statement and budgets to others. Thanks. When you hire support staff or a second attorney, what are your estimates as to how much they should add to the bottom line to “pay” for themselves? With an attorney it seems the 1/3 to profit, 1/3 operating expense, 1/3 their salary and benefits might be appropriate. What do you budget for? How about an admn. asst. and paralegal?

    • http://www.rosen.com Lee Rosen

      Another tough question and the leverage/pyramid model is disintegrating right before our eyes so I think these formulas are changing quickly.

      I’m more comfortable with 25% of the revenue generated being budgeted to non-payroll overhead expense and 20% going to salary and benefits (for that fee generator). The balance is allocated to other payroll (admin, marketing, management), marketing and profit. I think the 1/3 idea has changed as marketing has become a bigger percentage of overall expenses.

      Obviously, I’m generalizing. Hope it helps.

      Lee

  • http://raleigh-divorce-lawyers.com/ Jim Hart

    Lee,

    I think this is a great post and something that I’ve been talking about with my Wife lately. I’m getting busier and busier, and have to make decisions about when to bill and when to market the firm. When I practiced in Florida, a marketing coach told me that I should be spending at least 75% of my time marketing the practice. That leaves 25% for billable work and administrative items. Under those time constraints, there is absolutely no way that I could bill 5 hours per day.

    So what are my choices? The way I see it, I could increase my rate so I don’t have to bill 5 hours per day, I could hire a virtual marketing assistant to help me with some of the marketing work that I don’t need to do, or I could cut back some of the time marketing so that I have more time to bill. Or I just work 24/7.

    What are your thoughts on this? How much time should I be spending marketing? I’m leaning towards 70/30. Spend 70% of my time on marketing and admin, and devote at least three hours a day to billable work (assume a 10 hour day). I may change that to 60/40 as I get more work.

    Thanks for your ideas and information.

    Jim Hart

    • http://www.rosen.com Lee Rosen

      I think the idea of spending 70% of your time marketing is a complete disconnect for most practices – unless you have no billable work to do. If that’s the case then I’d spend as much free time as I had marketing.

      If the work is flowing then I’d cut the time way back and evaluate my goals. If I’m well capitalized and I want to grow quickly then I’d spend a big chunk of time on marketing. Unfortunately, most firms aren’t well capitalized and many aren’t all that interested in quick growth. If my goals were to build a small, thriving practice, then I’d probably spend about 15% of my time marketing and the balance delivering excellent service. My plan would include reducing that 15% steadily year after year as a result of the value of my reputation and the resulting referrals.

      Great comments and questions. Interesting food for thought.

      Lee

  • http://twitter.com/mikewhelanjr Mike Whelan

    @leerosen – budget question: when you say I should be taking 50% home, where are you budgeting the taxes? Is that in the 50% you’re calling expenses or in the 50% that you’re taking home?

    • http://divorcediscourse.com Lee Rosen

      I’m assuming the taxes are coming from the 50% you’re taking home. I think of the firm as a separate entity at all times so I’m assuming you’re paying the taxes from the wages paid to you by the entity and that the entity isn’t paying any taxes or it would simply pay you more and zero itself out.

      Lee

  • Pingback: Ready for Reinforcements? How Lawyers Can Make Their First Hire (Part I) | | Freedom Is The New RichFreedom Is The New Rich

Previous post:

Next post: