<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Cutting Off Deadbeats Will Increase Your Revenues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/12/04/cutting-deadbeats-increase-revenues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/12/04/cutting-deadbeats-increase-revenues/</link>
	<description>Lee Rosen on Family Law Marketing, Management and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hart</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/12/04/cutting-deadbeats-increase-revenues/#comment-1842</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=899#comment-1842</guid>
		<description>Great post Lee.  I know several attorneys who wait until the trust account is depleted to ask for more money - and usually it is a big chunk (thousands of dollars).  I would always bill my clients monthly - even when I had money in trust - and told my clients that if their trust account falls below a certain amount that all work on their case would stop.  I found it easier for the clients to make smaller payments once a month than to wait for when the trust account was gone to ask them for a huge chunk.

Lee - Do you or anyone alse out there keep a credit card on file in lieu of a trust balance?  Is that even ethically permissible?

Jim Hart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Lee.  I know several attorneys who wait until the trust account is depleted to ask for more money &#8211; and usually it is a big chunk (thousands of dollars).  I would always bill my clients monthly &#8211; even when I had money in trust &#8211; and told my clients that if their trust account falls below a certain amount that all work on their case would stop.  I found it easier for the clients to make smaller payments once a month than to wait for when the trust account was gone to ask them for a huge chunk.</p>
<p>Lee &#8211; Do you or anyone alse out there keep a credit card on file in lieu of a trust balance?  Is that even ethically permissible?</p>
<p>Jim Hart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleen staley</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/12/04/cutting-deadbeats-increase-revenues/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen staley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=899#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>we have gone to a fixed fee basis. But, we&#039;re still having a hard time explaining the benefits.
 It seems though that clients have the mistaken belief that the retainer is the whole fee. They also seem to have a tough time when they get bills were sometimes thousands of dollars and they are not prepared for it. When you do have a conversation about what the cost might actually be, they sometimes go down the street thinking&quot;no that could never be&quot;until they find another lawyer to tell them what they want to hear . Bottom line it is tough to make money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have gone to a fixed fee basis. But, we&#8217;re still having a hard time explaining the benefits.<br />
 It seems though that clients have the mistaken belief that the retainer is the whole fee. They also seem to have a tough time when they get bills were sometimes thousands of dollars and they are not prepared for it. When you do have a conversation about what the cost might actually be, they sometimes go down the street thinking&#8221;no that could never be&#8221;until they find another lawyer to tell them what they want to hear . Bottom line it is tough to make money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Rosen</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/12/04/cutting-deadbeats-increase-revenues/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=899#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

I couldn&#039;t agree with you more.

Your point about appearing interested in the case from the start is also critical. We send a couple of workbooks out right away to get the client busy and schedule a couple of meetings to gather info and evaluate the situation. We try to make a bunch of things happen in the first few days.

Thanks for contributing.

Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.</p>
<p>Your point about appearing interested in the case from the start is also critical. We send a couple of workbooks out right away to get the client busy and schedule a couple of meetings to gather info and evaluate the situation. We try to make a bunch of things happen in the first few days.</p>
<p>Thanks for contributing.</p>
<p>Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/12/04/cutting-deadbeats-increase-revenues/#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=899#comment-1821</guid>
		<description>The trick is right at the engagement, especially for non-in person engagements as those become increasingly more common- the longer you wait to collect the fee and don&#039;t jump right into handling the client&#039;s situation, some potential clients see that as lack of interest in the case, rather than a failure on their part to send in the fee.  One solution is to take a credit card payment by phone, which can speed up work on the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trick is right at the engagement, especially for non-in person engagements as those become increasingly more common- the longer you wait to collect the fee and don&#8217;t jump right into handling the client&#8217;s situation, some potential clients see that as lack of interest in the case, rather than a failure on their part to send in the fee.  One solution is to take a credit card payment by phone, which can speed up work on the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

