<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fixed Fees and A Long Cold Winter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/11/04/fixed-fees-long-cold-winter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/11/04/fixed-fees-long-cold-winter/</link>
	<description>Lee Rosen on Family Law Marketing, Management and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Roe</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/11/04/fixed-fees-long-cold-winter/#comment-1661</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Roe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=814#comment-1661</guid>
		<description>Lee: 

Fee Calculator function on your site is brilliant. 
One note: after describing the litigated fee case, at the bottom of the page are these words: 
&quot;For an estimation of fees for a case that involves filing a lawsuit, click below.&quot; I think the text meant to reference the non-litigated case, with the button being that for non-litigated. 

It&#039;s either early in the a.m. and I can&#039;t see straight, or my proofread is correct, for your webmaster&#039;s FYI.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee: </p>
<p>Fee Calculator function on your site is brilliant.<br />
One note: after describing the litigated fee case, at the bottom of the page are these words:<br />
&#8220;For an estimation of fees for a case that involves filing a lawsuit, click below.&#8221; I think the text meant to reference the non-litigated case, with the button being that for non-litigated. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s either early in the a.m. and I can&#8217;t see straight, or my proofread is correct, for your webmaster&#8217;s FYI.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Roe</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/11/04/fixed-fees-long-cold-winter/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Roe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=814#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>Lee: 

Thanks for the quick and solid response. You must be at your computer with a cup of coffee, getting ready for the morning court call, as I am . Good luck today. 

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee: </p>
<p>Thanks for the quick and solid response. You must be at your computer with a cup of coffee, getting ready for the morning court call, as I am . Good luck today. </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Rosen</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/11/04/fixed-fees-long-cold-winter/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=814#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Thanks for your kind words.

When we first switched to fixed fees we went back through 5 years of file and came up with some rough guidelines. Then we built the fee calculator on http://rosen.com.

We&#039;ve had to refine the fees over the years and make some tweaks to the client agreement. Sometimes we get it right, but sometimes we&#039;re off. Overall, it works out well.

Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Thanks for your kind words.</p>
<p>When we first switched to fixed fees we went back through 5 years of file and came up with some rough guidelines. Then we built the fee calculator on <a href="http://rosen.com" rel="nofollow">http://rosen.com</a>.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve had to refine the fees over the years and make some tweaks to the client agreement. Sometimes we get it right, but sometimes we&#8217;re off. Overall, it works out well.</p>
<p>Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Roe</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/11/04/fixed-fees-long-cold-winter/#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Roe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=814#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>Lee: 

I have through the years been interested in offering fixed fees for my divorce clients. The only concern has been the calculation of the proper fee. Is there a resource that your firm employed to determine the appropriate fixed fee per case? Do you assess the case, determine the likely hours/costs, and then set a fee, such as a general contractor for a building might? Do you reserve for trial costs, ie exclude a trial , if required, from the fixed fee? 

Thanks. I enjoy greatly your blog. If you could bottle your practice mgt. advice, you could sell it, and I would take a case. Or a truckload.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee: </p>
<p>I have through the years been interested in offering fixed fees for my divorce clients. The only concern has been the calculation of the proper fee. Is there a resource that your firm employed to determine the appropriate fixed fee per case? Do you assess the case, determine the likely hours/costs, and then set a fee, such as a general contractor for a building might? Do you reserve for trial costs, ie exclude a trial , if required, from the fixed fee? </p>
<p>Thanks. I enjoy greatly your blog. If you could bottle your practice mgt. advice, you could sell it, and I would take a case. Or a truckload.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

