<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brochures: Good For the Ad Agency, Bad For You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/10/28/good-agencies-pocketbook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/10/28/good-agencies-pocketbook/</link>
	<description>Lee Rosen on Family Law Marketing, Management and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Merenda</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/10/28/good-agencies-pocketbook/#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Merenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=528#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>I think there are two subjects here: 1) the validity of brochures as marketing tools, and 2) the content of the brochure. One could certainly argue that if the brochure is only &quot;about the law firm&quot; and not about potential clients and their problems, then it&#039;s money largely wasted, but that hardly invalidates brochures as a marketing medium. I think you picked the worst of the worst  a tri-fold brochure that is &quot;about the law firm&quot;  to make your point. Brochures are all about the first 15 seconds   the territory covered in Malcolm Gladwell&#039;s book Blink. Let&#039;s say I want to market estate planning to very affluent families. A substantial and sophisticated brochure placed in their hands causes an immediate first impression: &quot;This law firm is the kind that works with people like me.&quot; It&#039;s no different than having an impressive office, or an impressive website for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are two subjects here: 1) the validity of brochures as marketing tools, and 2) the content of the brochure. One could certainly argue that if the brochure is only &#8220;about the law firm&#8221; and not about potential clients and their problems, then it&#8217;s money largely wasted, but that hardly invalidates brochures as a marketing medium. I think you picked the worst of the worst  a tri-fold brochure that is &#8220;about the law firm&#8221;  to make your point. Brochures are all about the first 15 seconds   the territory covered in Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s book Blink. Let&#8217;s say I want to market estate planning to very affluent families. A substantial and sophisticated brochure placed in their hands causes an immediate first impression: &#8220;This law firm is the kind that works with people like me.&#8221; It&#8217;s no different than having an impressive office, or an impressive website for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny M.</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/10/28/good-agencies-pocketbook/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=528#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>Very true! 

Harsh that it may be, you speak the truth. Isn&#039;t that what we want from others...

If a person/customer can&#039;t see the &quot;what&#039;s in it for them&quot; from your advertisement. They will almost never give your business, let alone the advertisement any attention.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.documentsfordivorce.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Documents for Divorce&lt;/a&gt;
&quot;No matter what decision you make, &lt;b&gt;always make it an informed one...&lt;/b&gt;&quot;
Follow Us on Twitter &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twitter.com/DocsforDivorce&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DocsforDivorce&lt;/a&gt;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true! </p>
<p>Harsh that it may be, you speak the truth. Isn&#8217;t that what we want from others&#8230;</p>
<p>If a person/customer can&#8217;t see the &#8220;what&#8217;s in it for them&#8221; from your advertisement. They will almost never give your business, let alone the advertisement any attention.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.documentsfordivorce.com" rel="nofollow">Documents for Divorce</a><br />
&#8220;No matter what decision you make, <b>always make it an informed one&#8230;</b>&#8221;<br />
Follow Us on Twitter &#8220;<a href="http://www.twitter.com/DocsforDivorce" rel="nofollow">DocsforDivorce</a>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Rosen</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/10/28/good-agencies-pocketbook/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=528#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>Gabriel,

Agreed. It was harsh. Maybe I was having a bad day when I wrote it?

You make a valid point.

Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabriel,</p>
<p>Agreed. It was harsh. Maybe I was having a bad day when I wrote it?</p>
<p>You make a valid point.</p>
<p>Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Cheong</title>
		<link>http://divorcediscourse.com/2009/10/28/good-agencies-pocketbook/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Cheong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorcediscourse.com/?p=528#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>This is a bit harsh.  Different types of marketing works for different types of marketing niches.  Though I agree that a majority of people search online for attorneys, that is not the case for certain subgroups.

My firm invests heavily into online marketing and blogging, etc.  But 1/2 of my client base are Asian clients and brochures geared towards the Asian market has brought in a lot of business for my firm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit harsh.  Different types of marketing works for different types of marketing niches.  Though I agree that a majority of people search online for attorneys, that is not the case for certain subgroups.</p>
<p>My firm invests heavily into online marketing and blogging, etc.  But 1/2 of my client base are Asian clients and brochures geared towards the Asian market has brought in a lot of business for my firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

